<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Misfit&#8217;s Fisheries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/</link>
	<description>faults &#124; sins &#124; abuses</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: clew</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>clew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Have you read any of Elinor Ostrom's books on common resources, e.g. Governing the Commons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read any of Elinor Ostrom&#8217;s books on common resources, e.g. Governing the Commons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>No, I haven't -- what sort of perspective is Ostrom coming from?

I have to say, I was interested to see Shoshana Zuboff on your list of recent reviews -- her 1988 &lt;em&gt;In the Age of the Smart Machine&lt;/em&gt; seemed to me to do some really interesting stuff anticipating the tech-will-change-consciousness work of Sherry Turkle et al., only with a much more cautious (and intelligently so, to my mind) or perhaps even cautionary perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#8217;t &#8212; what sort of perspective is Ostrom coming from?</p>
<p>I have to say, I was interested to see Shoshana Zuboff on your list of recent reviews &#8212; her 1988 <em>In the Age of the Smart Machine</em> seemed to me to do some really interesting stuff anticipating the tech-will-change-consciousness work of Sherry Turkle et al., only with a much more cautious (and intelligently so, to my mind) or perhaps even cautionary perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clew</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>clew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>What I've read of Ostrom's work: descriptions of actual, generations-old common resources and how they're managed. I remember a lot of irrigation works, examples from several continents, and the social/religious/political systems to share out the work and the rewards differed quite a lot. Most of them were under stress from outside and some were more resilient than others.

I think that was some of the first solid explanation of why "the tragedy of the commons" is a) not inevitable and b) a really poor choice of name. She's written a lot since then, I think she is now a Name on co-written books, but I haven't kept up.

I was actually looking for ...Smart Machine, but it was out and the library had this later book instead. I'll try again, but I might just be completely out of phase with her writing. 

I like your blog because, of all the writers who read... I don't even know what it's called; very reflexive and in danger of equivocation... I get the best sense that there is an actual subject under discussion from you. Someday I may understand a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve read of Ostrom&#8217;s work: descriptions of actual, generations-old common resources and how they&#8217;re managed. I remember a lot of irrigation works, examples from several continents, and the social/religious/political systems to share out the work and the rewards differed quite a lot. Most of them were under stress from outside and some were more resilient than others.</p>
<p>I think that was some of the first solid explanation of why &#8220;the tragedy of the commons&#8221; is a) not inevitable and b) a really poor choice of name. She&#8217;s written a lot since then, I think she is now a Name on co-written books, but I haven&#8217;t kept up.</p>
<p>I was actually looking for &#8230;Smart Machine, but it was out and the library had this later book instead. I&#8217;ll try again, but I might just be completely out of phase with her writing. </p>
<p>I like your blog because, of all the writers who read&#8230; I don&#8217;t even know what it&#8217;s called; very reflexive and in danger of equivocation&#8230; I get the best sense that there is an actual subject under discussion from you. Someday I may understand a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Hm. I think such a "solid explanation" would certainly help me some, largely because I share much of Hardin's pessimism about the way people will act &lt;em&gt;on their own&lt;/em&gt;, but intensely dislike his Malthusian perspective, and so hope to perhaps find some non-individually-based concrete economic understanding of &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; it might be "not inevitable". Thanks for the recommendation: definitely have to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. I think such a &#8220;solid explanation&#8221; would certainly help me some, largely because I share much of Hardin&#8217;s pessimism about the way people will act <em>on their own</em>, but intensely dislike his Malthusian perspective, and so hope to perhaps find some non-individually-based concrete economic understanding of <em>how</em> it might be &#8220;not inevitable&#8221;. Thanks for the recommendation: definitely have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clew</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>clew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2003/12/09/the-misfits-fisheries/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>If you're willing to sign in at Amazon, "Search Inside"  
Governing the Commons : The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
for Alanya; pp. 18-20 describe "An Empirical Alternative" to the tragedy, or Leviathan, or privatization.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re willing to sign in at Amazon, &#8220;Search Inside&#8221;<br />
Governing the Commons : The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action<br />
for Alanya; pp. 18-20 describe &#8220;An Empirical Alternative&#8221; to the tragedy, or Leviathan, or privatization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
