<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4Cs: Reading and Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/</link>
	<description>faults &#124; sins &#124; abuses</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/#comment-17739</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/#comment-17739</guid>
		<description>Tom, thanks for the response! My note-taking was slow and so I missed the context of Mariolina's remark. I ran this by Mariolina before posting it, so I'll ask her again about the reference to your work and see if I can find a cite. As I hope my parenthetical question indicates, I'm uneasy about the risk of misrepresenting either your work or hers, particularly since I find both your work quite valuable: I've lately returned to &lt;em&gt;The Performance of Self&lt;/em&gt; in thinking about the practice of blogging in composition pedagogy and Thomas de Zengotita's thoughts in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/13/on-egocasting/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mediated&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; about the contemporary public performance of self. I'll try to further clarify here when I'm able to get more information. Thank you again for the comment and the correction -- and I'd be grateful to hear more of your thoughts about the role of reading in the composition classroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, thanks for the response! My note-taking was slow and so I missed the context of Mariolina&#8217;s remark. I ran this by Mariolina before posting it, so I&#8217;ll ask her again about the reference to your work and see if I can find a cite. As I hope my parenthetical question indicates, I&#8217;m uneasy about the risk of misrepresenting either your work or hers, particularly since I find both your work quite valuable: I&#8217;ve lately returned to <em>The Performance of Self</em> in thinking about the practice of blogging in composition pedagogy and Thomas de Zengotita&#8217;s thoughts in <em><a href="http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/13/on-egocasting/" rel="nofollow">Mediated</a></em> about the contemporary public performance of self. I&#8217;ll try to further clarify here when I&#8217;m able to get more information. Thank you again for the comment and the correction &#8212; and I&#8217;d be grateful to hear more of your thoughts about the role of reading in the composition classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Newkirk</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/#comment-17734</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Newkirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/03/22/4cs-reading-and-writing/#comment-17734</guid>
		<description>I don't know what remark I made could be interpreted as dismissing the significance of the reading-writing connection. Clearly it is one of the most generative intersections anyone could imagine. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what remark I made could be interpreted as dismissing the significance of the reading-writing connection. Clearly it is one of the most generative intersections anyone could imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
