<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NYT Tries Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/</link>
	<description>faults &#124; sins &#124; abuses</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17250</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17250</guid>
		<description>Viviane's comment there is right on the mark: the later stories in the series serve only to confirm the NYT's role as fluffer for wealth and privilege.

I'll admit, Clancy, that I can never quite figure out the tenor of your political comments. Where I live, I regularly interact with plenty of people like the vaguely and self-satisfiedly hippy-dippy Anne Lamott, and it's no surprise to me that she'd be writing on Joshua Micah Marshall's self-satisfiedly left-wing group blog. Sure, my further-left-than-either-of-them politics give me a huge and abiding anger at the current administration, and I'm disgusted at the shameless mendacity of folks like Michelle Malkin and LGF, but I also have little patience for folks on the left who don't stop to critically examine their own beliefs. With your research interests in punditry, I'm sure you read such sites with a far more nuanced perspective than my own -- which is maybe why I scratch my head and try to figure out where you're coming from when you mention pundit blogs, whether it's TPM Cafe, Powerline, or Glenn Reynolds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viviane&#8217;s comment there is right on the mark: the later stories in the series serve only to confirm the NYT&#8217;s role as fluffer for wealth and privilege.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit, Clancy, that I can never quite figure out the tenor of your political comments. Where I live, I regularly interact with plenty of people like the vaguely and self-satisfiedly hippy-dippy Anne Lamott, and it&#8217;s no surprise to me that she&#8217;d be writing on Joshua Micah Marshall&#8217;s self-satisfiedly left-wing group blog. Sure, my further-left-than-either-of-them politics give me a huge and abiding anger at the current administration, and I&#8217;m disgusted at the shameless mendacity of folks like Michelle Malkin and LGF, but I also have little patience for folks on the left who don&#8217;t stop to critically examine their own beliefs. With your research interests in punditry, I&#8217;m sure you read such sites with a far more nuanced perspective than my own &#8212; which is maybe why I scratch my head and try to figure out where you&#8217;re coming from when you mention pundit blogs, whether it&#8217;s TPM Cafe, Powerline, or Glenn Reynolds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clancy</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17239</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17239</guid>
		<description>Check out the discussion at &lt;a href="http://warrenreports.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/6/6/214833/9089" rel="nofollow"&gt;TPM Cafe&lt;/a&gt; about the series. I'm enjoying reading over there; did you know that Anne freakin' LAMOTT writes &lt;a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/author/annelamott" rel="nofollow"&gt;for them&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the discussion at <a href="http://warrenreports.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/6/6/214833/9089" rel="nofollow">TPM Cafe</a> about the series. I&#8217;m enjoying reading over there; did you know that Anne freakin&#8217; LAMOTT writes <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/author/annelamott" rel="nofollow">for them</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senioritis</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17098</link>
		<dc:creator>senioritis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 03:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17098</guid>
		<description>I concur with your decision to exercise discretion.  Oddly enough, earlier today I was remembering when in 1997 I interviewed at TCU.  At the conclusion of my job talk, Gary Tate raised his hand from the back of the room and said, "You &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; aware that what you're saying runs directly counter to everything my work stands for?"  You could have heard a pin drop in that room.  And I simply said, "Yes, I do."  I don't remember what happened after that.  I do know that I got the job and that Gary was a generous, dynamic colleague whom I valued every day.  But let's face it;  lots and lots of gatekeepers in departments don't have the flexibility that Gary does;  they want people who agree with them, not people who will challenge them.

Back to the listserv:  thanks for that perspective.  I'll persevere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your decision to exercise discretion.  Oddly enough, earlier today I was remembering when in 1997 I interviewed at TCU.  At the conclusion of my job talk, Gary Tate raised his hand from the back of the room and said, &#8220;You <i>are</i> aware that what you&#8217;re saying runs directly counter to everything my work stands for?&#8221;  You could have heard a pin drop in that room.  And I simply said, &#8220;Yes, I do.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t remember what happened after that.  I do know that I got the job and that Gary was a generous, dynamic colleague whom I valued every day.  But let&#8217;s face it;  lots and lots of gatekeepers in departments don&#8217;t have the flexibility that Gary does;  they want people who agree with them, not people who will challenge them.</p>
<p>Back to the listserv:  thanks for that perspective.  I&#8217;ll persevere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17097</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17097</guid>
		<description>Yes, I am a little unnerved, and I've spoken up on-list about my worries about such assumptions in the past, and have subsequently been characterized as "attacking" people. Which is why -- as someone who's on the job market in the fall -- I don't have much to say on the list these days. But yes, I'm troubled by those on the list who claim "working class" status (the "personal choice" you describe) when, according to the AAUP, the average salary for higher ed (averaging together professors, associate profs, assistant profs, lecturers, and instructors) is $56,273. And of course I'm opposed to the ridiculous assertion about the military, and I did some of the challenging.

I think the list has a lot of smart, serious, good-hearted people on it. But I also think it sometimes becomes an echo chamber that permits very little room for dissent, and as a grad student who's been sternly reprimanded off-list by one of its luminaries for daring to ask a clarifying question, I'm a lurker these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I am a little unnerved, and I&#8217;ve spoken up on-list about my worries about such assumptions in the past, and have subsequently been characterized as &#8220;attacking&#8221; people. Which is why &#8212; as someone who&#8217;s on the job market in the fall &#8212; I don&#8217;t have much to say on the list these days. But yes, I&#8217;m troubled by those on the list who claim &#8220;working class&#8221; status (the &#8220;personal choice&#8221; you describe) when, according to the AAUP, the average salary for higher ed (averaging together professors, associate profs, assistant profs, lecturers, and instructors) is $56,273. And of course I&#8217;m opposed to the ridiculous assertion about the military, and I did some of the challenging.</p>
<p>I think the list has a lot of smart, serious, good-hearted people on it. But I also think it sometimes becomes an echo chamber that permits very little room for dissent, and as a grad student who&#8217;s been sternly reprimanded off-list by one of its luminaries for daring to ask a clarifying question, I&#8217;m a lurker these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senioritis</title>
		<link>http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17096</link>
		<dc:creator>senioritis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 22:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitia.org/wordpress/archives/2005/05/27/the-nyt-tries-class/#comment-17096</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I haven't been reading the series.  I'm afraid that I decided when they announced it that it was going to be a snore.

But while I've got you on this topic, I want to ask a question:  are you a little unnerved by some of the assumptions underlying recent posts on the Working-Class listserv?  I don't have them in front of me, but they included assumptions such as &lt;i&gt;class is a personal choice&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;people in the military are opposed to the working class&lt;/i&gt;.  The latter of these has actually been challenged on the list;  the former has not.  And then there's the matter of the sweeping stereotypes in the listserv discussion, stereotypes about the working class as well as military families.  I'm new to that list and not ready to post to it.  But I'm wondering whether I will even want to continue on the list.  Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I haven&#8217;t been reading the series.  I&#8217;m afraid that I decided when they announced it that it was going to be a snore.</p>
<p>But while I&#8217;ve got you on this topic, I want to ask a question:  are you a little unnerved by some of the assumptions underlying recent posts on the Working-Class listserv?  I don&#8217;t have them in front of me, but they included assumptions such as <i>class is a personal choice</i> and <i>people in the military are opposed to the working class</i>.  The latter of these has actually been challenged on the list;  the former has not.  And then there&#8217;s the matter of the sweeping stereotypes in the listserv discussion, stereotypes about the working class as well as military families.  I&#8217;m new to that list and not ready to post to it.  But I&#8217;m wondering whether I will even want to continue on the list.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
